Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: PS
Volume 30, 2026
Page(s) 410 - 448
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ps/2026007
Published online 31 July 2026
  1. T. Augustin, F.P.A. Coolen, G. de Cooman and M.C.M. Troffaes, Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities. John Wiley & Sons,, West Sussex, England (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. M.C.M. Troffaes and G. de Cooman, Lower Previsions. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Walley, Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, vol. 42 of Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman and Hall, London (1991). [Google Scholar]
  4. R.J. Crossman and D. Škulj, Imprecise Markov chains with absorption. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 51 (2010) 1085–1099. Imprecise probability in statistical inference and decision making. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. De Bock, A. Erreygers and T. Krak, Sum-product laws and efficient algorithms for imprecise Markov chains, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 161 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, edited by C. de Campos and M.H. Maathuis. PMLR (2021) 1476–1485. [Google Scholar]
  6. G. de Cooman, F. Hermans and E. Quaeghebeur, Imprecise Markov chains and their limit behaviour. Probab. Eng. Inform. Sci. 23 (2009) 597–635. [Google Scholar]
  7. K.V. Delgado, S. Sanner and L.N. De Barros, Efficient solutions to factored MDPs with imprecise transition probabilities. Artif. Intell. 175 (2011) 1498–1527. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Jaeger, G. Bacci, G. Bacci, K.G. Larsen and P. Jensen, Approximating euclidean by imprecise Markov decision processes, in Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Verification Principles: 9th International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, ISoLA 2020, Rhodes, Greece, October 20-30, 2020, Proceedings, Part I. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag (2020) 275–289. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Krak, J. De Bock and A. Siebes, Imprecise continuous-time Markov chains. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 88 (2017) 452–528. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Krak, N. T'Joens and J. De Bock, Hitting times and probabilities for imprecise Markov chains, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities: Theories and Applications, vol. 103 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, edited by J. De Bock, C.P. de Campos, G. de Cooman, E. Quaeghebeur and G. Wheeler. PMLR (2019) 265–275. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. T'Joens and J. De Bock, Average behaviour in discrete-time imprecise Markov chains: a study of weak ergodicity. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 132 (2021) 181–205. [Google Scholar]
  12. F.W. Trevizan, F.G. Cozman and L.N. De Barros, Mixed probabilistic and nondeterministic factored planning through markov decision processes with set-valued transitions, in Workshop on A Reality Check for Planning and Scheduling Under Uncertainty at ICAPS (2008) 62. [Google Scholar]
  13. F.W. Trevizan, F.G. Cozman and L.N. de Barros, Planning under risk and knightian uncertainty. In IJCAI, vol. 2007 (2007) 2023–2028. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Troffaes, T. Krak and H. Bains, Two-state imprecise Markov chains for statistical modelling of two-state non-Markovian processes, in Proceedings ofthe Eleventh International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities: Theories and Applications, vol. 103 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, edited by J. De Bock, C.P. de Campos, G. de Cooman, E. Quaeghebeur and G. Wheeler. PMLR (2019) 394–403. [Google Scholar]
  15. L.J.M. Aslett, F.P.A. Coolen and J. De Bock, editors, Uncertainty in Engineering: Introduction to Methods and Applications, vol. 7 of SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer Cham (2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Vasile, editor, Optimization Under Uncertainty with Applications to Aerospace Engineering, vol. 6 of Physics and Astronomy. Springer Cham (2021). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Cerreia-Vioglio, R. Corrao and G. Lanzani, Dynamic opinion aggregation: long-run stability and disagreement. Rev. Econ. Stud. 91 (2024) 1406–1447. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Denk, M. Kupper and M. Nendel, Kolmogorov-type and general extension results for nonlinear expectations. Banach J. Math. Anal. 12 (2018) 515–540. [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Denk, M. Kupper and M. Nendel, A semigroup approach to nonlinear Lévy processes. Stochastic Processes Appl. 130 (2020) 1616–1642. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Choquet, Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5 (1954) 131–295. [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Cuzzolin, The Geometry of Uncertainty: The Geometry of Imprecise Probabilities. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Springer Cham (2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Caprio and R. Gong, Dynamic precise and imprecise probability kinematics, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, vol. 215 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, edited by E. Miranda, I. Montes, E. Quaeghebeur and B. Vantaggi. PMLR (2023) 72–83. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Caprio and S. Mukherjee, Ergodic theorems for dynamic imprecise probability kinematics. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 152 (2023) 325–343. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Cerreia-Vioglio, F. Maccheroni and M. Marinacci, Ergodic theorems for lower probabilities. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 144 (2015) 3381–3396. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. de Cooman, J. De Bock and S. Lopatatzidis, Imprecise stochastic processes in discrete time: global models, imprecise markov chains, and ergodic theorems. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 76 (2016) 18–46. [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Hermans and G. de Cooman, Characterisation of ergodic upper transition operators. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 53 (2012) 573–583. [Google Scholar]
  27. I.O. Kozine and L.V. Utkin, Interval-valued finite Markov chains. Reliable Comput. 8 (2002) 97–113. [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Skulj, A classification of invariant distributions and convergence of imprecise Markov chains. Linear Algebra Appl. 439 (2013) 3059–3076. [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Skulj, Efficient computation of the bounds of continuous time imprecise Markov chains. Appl. Math. Computat. 250 (2015) 165–180. [Google Scholar]
  30. Q. Yu, C. Li, Y. Zhu and T. Kurita, Convolutional autoencoder based on latent subspace projection for anomaly detection. Methods 214 (2023) 48–59. [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Pérez, Markov random fields and images. CWI Q. 11 (1998) 413–437. [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Bakry, I. Gentil and M. Ledoux, Analysis and Geometry of Markov Diffusion Operators, vol. 20 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer Cham (2014). [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Blount and M.A. Kouritzin, On convergence determining and separating classes of functions. Stochastic Processes Appl. 120 (2010) 1898–1907. [Google Scholar]
  34. S.N Ethier and T.G. Kurtz, Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence. John Wiley & Sons (1986). [Google Scholar]
  35. E.S. Wolk, Order-compatible topologies on a partially ordered set. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 9 (1958) 524–529. [Google Scholar]
  36. D. Bartl, Conditional nonlinear expectations. Stochastic Processes Appl. 130 (2020) 785–805. [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Criens and L. Niemann, Markov selections and feller properties of nonlinear diffusions. Stochastic Processes Appl. 173 (2024) 104354. [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Erreygers, Sublinear expectations for countable-state uncertain processes, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, vol. 215 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, edited by E. Miranda, I. Montes, E. Quaeghebeur and B. Vantaggi. PMLR (2023) 210–221. [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Feng and H. Zhao, Ergodicity of Sublinear Markovian Semigroups. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021) 5646–5681. [Google Scholar]
  40. F. Kühn, On infinitesimal generators of sublinear Markov semigroups. Osaka J. Math. 58 (2021) 487–508. [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Nendel, Markov chains under nonlinear expectation. Math. Finance 31 (2021) 474–507. [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Berger, A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2003). [Google Scholar]
  43. R. van Handel, Probability in high dimension. APC 550 Lecture Notes., Princeton University. Available at online (2016). [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Bishop, A relation between volume, mean curvature and diameter. Notices Am. Math. Soc. 10 (1963) 364. [Google Scholar]
  45. K. Kuwada, Duality on gradient estimates and wasserstein controls. J. Funct. Anal. 258 (2010) 3758–3774. [Google Scholar]
  46. G. Savaré, Self-improvement of the Bakry-Emery condition and wasserstein contraction of the heat flow in RCD(k, ∞) metric measure spaces. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. A 34 (2014) 1641–1661. [Google Scholar]
  47. D. Azagra, J. Ferrera, F. López-Mesas and Y. Rangel, Smooth approximation of Lipschitz functions on Riemannian manifolds. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 326 (2007) 1370–1378. [Google Scholar]
  48. W.H. Fleming and H. Mete Soner, Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, 2nd edn. Springer (2006). [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Caprio, Optimal transport for ϵ-contaminated credal sets. Theories and Applications, PMLR 290 (2025) 33–46. [Google Scholar]
  50. S. Lorenzini, D. Petturiti and B. Vantaggi, Choquet-wasserstein pseudo-distances via optimal transport under partially specified marginal probabilities. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 515 (2025) 109429. [Google Scholar]
  51. V. Lin, K.J. Jang, S. Dutta, M. Caprio, O. Sokolsky and I. Lee, DC4L: Distribution Shift Recovery via Data-Driven Control for Deep Learning Models. Available at arXiv:2302.10341 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  52. S. Horowitz, Semi-groups of Markov Operators. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare B Calcul Probab. Statist 10 (1974) 155–166. [Google Scholar]
  53. Y. Ito, Invariant measures for Markov processes. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 110 (1964) 152–184. [Google Scholar]
  54. E. Hille and R.S. Phillips, Functional Analysis and Semi-Groups. American Mathematical Society (1996). [Google Scholar]
  55. M. Ledoux, The geometry of Markov diffusion generators. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse: Math. Ser. 9 (2000) 305–366. [Google Scholar]
  56. S. Lang, Algebra. Springer, New York (2002). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.