Free Access
Volume 13, January 2009
Page(s) 437 - 458
Published online 22 September 2009
  1. J. Abbott and T. Mulders, How tight is Hadamard bound? Experiment. Math. 10 (2001) 331–336. [MathSciNet]
  2. A. Akhavi, Analyse comparative d'algorithmes de réduction sur les réseaux aléatoires. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Caen (1999).
  3. A. Akhavi, Random lattices, threshold phenomena and efficient reduction algorithms. Theor. Comput. Sci. 287 (2002) 359–385. [CrossRef]
  4. A. Akhavi, J.-F. Marckert and A. Rouault. On the reduction of a random basis, in D. Applegate, G.S. Brodal, D. Panario and R. Sedgewick Eds. Proceedings of the ninth workshop on algorithm engineering and experiments and the fourth workshop on analytic algorithmics and combinatorics. New Orleans (2007).
  5. T.W. Anderson, An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Third edition. John Wiley (2003).
  6. N.R. Chaganthy, Large deviations for joint distributions and statistical applications. Sankhya 59 (1997) 147–166.
  7. L. Chaumont and M. Yor, Exercises in probability. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
  8. H. Daudé and B. Vallée, An upper bound on the average number of iterations of the LLL algorithm. Theor. Comput. Sci. 123 (1994) 95–115. [CrossRef]
  9. J.D. Dixon, How good is Hadamard's inequality for determinants? Can. Math. Bull. 27 (1984) 260–264. [CrossRef]
  10. J.L. Donaldson, Minkowski reduction of integral matrices. Math. Comput. 33 (1979) 201–216. [CrossRef]
  11. A. Edelman and N.R. Rao, Random matrix theory. Acta Numerica (2005) 1–65.
  12. Y.H. Gan, C. Ling, and W.H. Mow, Complex Lattice Reduction Algorithm for Low-Complexity MIMO Detection. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 57 (2009) 2701–2710. [CrossRef]
  13. J. Hadamard, Résolution d'une question relative aux déterminants. Bull. Sci. Math. 17 (1893) 240–246.
  14. R. Kannan, Algorithmic geometry of numbers, in Annual review of computer science, Vol. 2. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA (1987) 231–267.
  15. D.E. Knuth, The art of computer programming, Vol. 2. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass., second edition. Seminumerical algorithms, Addison-Wesley Series in Computer Science and Information Processing (1981).
  16. H. Koy and C.P. Schnorr, Segment LLL-Reduction of Lattice Bases. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2146 (2001) 67. [CrossRef]
  17. H.W. Lenstra Jr., Integer programming and cryptography. Math. Intelligencer 6 (1984) 14–19. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  18. H.W. Lenstra Jr., Flags and lattice basis reduction. In European Congress of Mathematics, Vol. I (Barcelona, 2000). Progr. Math. 201 37–51. Birkhäuser, Basel (2001).
  19. A.K. Lenstra, H.W. Lenstra Jr. and L. Lovász, Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients. Math. Ann. 261 (1982) 515–534. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  20. G. Letac, Isotropy and sphericity: some characterisations of the normal distribution. Ann. Statist. 9 (1981) 408–417. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  21. R.J. Muirhead, Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. John Wiley (1982).
  22. H. Napias, A generalization of the LLL-algorithm over euclidean rings or orders. Journal de théorie des nombres de Bordeaux 8 (1996) 387–396.
  23. P.Q. Nguyen and J. Stern, The two faces of lattices in cryptology. In Cryptography and lattices (Providence, RI, 2001). Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2146 (2001) 146–180. Springer. [CrossRef]
  24. A. Rouault, Asymptotic behavior of random determinants in the Laguerre, Gram and Jacobi ensembles. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 3 (2007) 181–230 (electronic). [MathSciNet]
  25. C.P. Schnorr, A hierarchy of polynomial time basis reduction algorithms. Theory of algorithms, Colloq. Pécs/Hung, 1984. Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 44 (1986) 375–386.
  26. B. Vallée, Un problème central en géométrie algorithmique des nombres : la réduction des réseaux. Autour de l'algorithme de Lenstra Lenstra Lovasz. RAIRO Inform. Théor. Appl. 3 (1989) 345–376. English translation by E. Kranakis in CWI-Quarterly - 1990 - 3.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.