EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 30 (2026) ESAIM: PS, 30 (2026) 354-371 References
Issue
ESAIM: PS
Volume 30, 2026
SAMO 2025 - Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis, from Theory to App
Page(s) 354 - 371
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ps/2026005
Published online 16 July 2026
  1. G. Perrin, Adaptive calibration of a computer code with time-series output. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 196 (2020) 106728. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Roberts, M. Osborne, M. Ebden, S. Reece, N. Gibson and S. Aigrain, Gaussian processes for time-series modelling. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 371 (1984) 20110550. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Lara-Benítez, M. Carranza-García and J.C.R. Santos, An experimental review on deep learning architectures for time series forecasting. Int. J. Neural Syst. (2020) 2130001. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Alexanderian, P.A. Gremaud and R.C. Smith, Variance-based sensitivity analysis for time-dependent processes. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 196 (2020) 106722. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Saltelli, Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal. 22 (2002) 579–590. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Chan, A. Saltelli and S. Tarantola, Sensitivity analysis of model output: Variance-based methods make the difference, in Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (1997) 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  7. I.M. Sobol, Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models (1993) https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:115460399 [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Campbell, M.D. McKay and B.J. Williams, Sensitivity analysis when model outputs are functions. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (2006) 1468–1472. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Lamboni, H. Monod and D. Makowski, Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (2011) 450–459. [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Gamboa, A. Janon, T. Klein and A. Lagnoux, Sensitivity analysis for multidimensional and functional outputs. Electron. J. Statist. 8 (2014) 575–603. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Ghanem and P. Spanos, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Civil, Mechanical and Other Engineering Series. Dover Publications (2003). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Song, Z. Bai, H. Wei and Y. Xiao, Copula-based methods for global sensitivity analysis with correlated random variables and stochastic processes under incomplete probability information. Aerospace Sci. Technol. 129 (2022) 107811. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer New York (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Chastaing, C. Prieur and F. Gamboa, Generalized Sobol sensitivity indices for dependent variables: numerical methods (2014) https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4372. [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Liu and Y. Choe, Data-driven sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs using the polynomial chaos expansion. Struct. Saf. 88 (2018) 101984. [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Hoeffding, A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 19 (1948) 293–325. [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Chastaing, F. Gamboa and C. Prieur, Generalized Hoeffding–Sobol decomposition for dependent variables – application to sensitivity analysis. Electron. J. Statist. 6 (2011) 2420–2448. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Li, H. Rabitz, P. Yelvington, O. Oluwole, F. Bacon, C. Kolb and J. Schoendorf, Global sensitivity analysis for systems with independent and/or correlated inputs. J. Phys. Chem. A 114 (2010) 6022–6032. [Google Scholar]
  19. A.B. Owen and C. Prieur, On Shapley value for measuring importance of dependent inputs. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 5 (2017) 986–1002. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Herin, M. Il Idrissi, V. Chabridon and B. Iooss, Proportional marginal effects for global sensitivity analysis. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 12 (2024) 667–692. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Blatman and B. Sudret, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J. Computat. Phys. 230 (2011) 2345–2367. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Gasparrini, B. Armstrong and M.G. Kenward, Distributed lag non-linear models. Statist. Med. 29 (2010) 2224–2234. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Kelly, R. Longjohn and K. Nottingham, The UCI machine learning repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Zhang, B. Guo, A. Dong, J. He, Z. Xu and S.X. Chen, Cautionary tales on air-quality improvement in Beijing. Proc. Roy. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 473 (2017) 20170457. [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Hong, P. Pinson and S. Fan, Global energy forecasting competition 2012. Int. J. Forecast. 30 (2014) 357–363. [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Bouche, R. Flamary, F. d'Alche Buc, R. Plougonven, M. Clausel, J. Badosa and P. Drobinski, Wind power predictions from nowcasts to 4-hour forecasts: a learning approach with variable selection. Renewable Energy 211 (2023) 938–947. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Yachouti, G. Perrin and J. Garnier, Python code for "Towards history-aware sensitivity analysis for time series". https://github.com/ymouad/Towards-History-aware-Sensitivity-Analysis-For-Time-Series. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.